Una pregunta que me gustó, al tocar dos de mis temas favoritos de un plumazo:
3. Is it possible something might be morally wrong for no other reason than that God determines that it is wrong? For example, imagine that God has declared that drinking water is wrong, and when she is asked why she replies honestly "for no other reason than that I say it is."Taboo - The Results
Taboo has been played 54610 times.
Your Moralising Quotient of 0.21 compares to an average Moralising Quotient of 0.34. This means that as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned you are more permissive than average.
Your Interference Factor of 0.25 compares to an average Interference Factor of 0.23. This means that as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned you are more likely to recommend societal interference in matters of moral wrongdoing, in the form of prevention or punishment, than average.
Your Universalising Factor of 0.00 compares to an average Universalising Factor of 0.42. This means you are less likely than average to see moral wrongdoing in universal terms - that is, without regard to prevailing cultural norms and social conventions (at least as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned).
Más detalles de mi resultado aquí
Pero recordad: A pesar de usar términos grandilocuentes y hacernos sopesar dilemas morales, no es más que otro test del lunes, no vayamos a mayores!